well you do it that way then, I chose to make it look like this
HappyToast Groat froth,
Sun 9 Mar 2008, 20:41,
archived)
I was offering constructive criticism,not suggesting that you are a cunt.
(
LordManley twitter.com/LordManley,
Sun 9 Mar 2008, 20:48,
archived)
no you weren'tyou were saying it's poor quality.
But at 256 dithered colours is at the highest level you can achieve with a gif animation ;P
(But at 256 dithered colours is at the highest level you can achieve with a gif animation ;P
HappyToast Groat froth,
Sun 9 Mar 2008, 20:50,
archived)
I was wrong about the reason,but the quality is poor.
The fact that this is not because of optimisation, but because you have inexplicably chosen to stretch an image does not stop it being pixelated.
The file, when viewed at the size it was saved at, looks smoother and the motion looks better as well.
Perhaps you are on a monitor with an exceptionally high resolution, but here the stretched one looks significantly worse.
(The fact that this is not because of optimisation, but because you have inexplicably chosen to stretch an image does not stop it being pixelated.
The file, when viewed at the size it was saved at, looks smoother and the motion looks better as well.
Perhaps you are on a monitor with an exceptionally high resolution, but here the stretched one looks significantly worse.
LordManley twitter.com/LordManley,
Sun 9 Mar 2008, 20:56,
archived)