I think most of the people who make that mistake when they start do so because they don't know about the limit at all.But yes, making it clearer wouldn't hurt.
(
my other username is a porsche , posting shit pictures so you don't have to,
Sun 23 Mar 2008, 21:07,
archived)
truebut i'd still feel awkward telling people that they must abide by an unwritten rule. if we're going to lay on the abuse when an image goes over 50k, the faq shouldn't be dithering around saying "well, you don't really need it to be more than 50k you know, um..."
(
spacefish bong!,
Sun 23 Mar 2008, 21:20,
archived)
Yeah, I see what you mean.I think the fact that people jump on the 'fuck off' bandwagon is a bigger problem.
When you're polite and tell them 50k is a general limit, they normally pay attention and at least make the next image smaller.
(When you're polite and tell them 50k is a general limit, they normally pay attention and at least make the next image smaller.
my other username is a porsche , posting shit pictures so you don't have to,
Sun 23 Mar 2008, 21:23,
archived)
i think you've hit the nail on the headbut i'm tired of telling people to play nice, especially if they genuinely think they're being helpful. if there's a simple way to give folks less reason to be nasty, i want it to happen
( spacefish bong!,
Sun 23 Mar 2008, 21:32,
archived)
I have no idea what could be done about it, people seem to enjoy the flaming.But it must give this place an unfriendly appearance to new people.
( my other username is a porsche , posting shit pictures so you don't have to,
Sun 23 Mar 2008, 21:34,
archived)
'people seem to enjoy the flaming'being the nail on the head
(
Jahled Three shades of black,
Sun 23 Mar 2008, 21:43,
archived)