b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 8211427 (Thread)

# Mr. Potato Head Jr.
[Mod edit: Dammit people, 50k for static images, it's not that difficult is it?]

sryz I'm meant to do that
(, Sun 23 Mar 2008, 20:41, archived)
# That man's got no cock!
(, Sun 23 Mar 2008, 20:41, archived)
# Oi!
No cock!

(, Sun 23 Mar 2008, 20:41, archived)
# Yeah,
I didn't fucking think so.
(, Sun 23 Mar 2008, 20:42, archived)
# how does he smell?
(, Sun 23 Mar 2008, 20:41, archived)
# Detroit.
(, Sun 23 Mar 2008, 20:42, archived)
# Alaska
Nipples
(, Sun 23 Mar 2008, 20:43, archived)
# Its in between his legz
(, Sun 23 Mar 2008, 20:42, archived)
# How does he spell?
(, Sun 23 Mar 2008, 20:42, archived)
# 100kb? slightly large?
YAAAY!

BIGGARRRRR etc
(, Sun 23 Mar 2008, 20:41, archived)
# Life Size!
(, Sun 23 Mar 2008, 20:42, archived)
# heh
I don't personally care to be fair, and rather like it.

But any excuse to shout.

BIG BROWN POTATO!
(, Sun 23 Mar 2008, 20:43, archived)
# not quite as big as gonzo's but....
(, Sun 23 Mar 2008, 20:42, archived)
# WOAH
(, Sun 23 Mar 2008, 20:42, archived)
# how the greasy poop?
did a jpg like that get to 100k? It's mainly 1 colour
(, Sun 23 Mar 2008, 20:45, archived)
# compression switched off most likely
(, Sun 23 Mar 2008, 20:48, archived)
# learn to use file types
you could have saved that out as a gif or better still a png and it would have been tiny
(, Sun 23 Mar 2008, 20:47, archived)
# we should change the wording about image sizes in the faq
because some people don't realise it's a rigid rule, not something that you should aim for but it's okay to break occasionally. i know that's how it was traditionally, but i think it makes too many people angry now (despite the fact that internet connections are only getting faster). it'd avoid a few clashes with new folk who are just getting the swing of things
(, Sun 23 Mar 2008, 20:55, archived)
# It's not that hard to abide by is it dude?
How hard is it to optimize for christ's sake, especially with the above needlessly large example
(, Sun 23 Mar 2008, 21:05, archived)
# it's not about abiding by it
it's that the faq doesn't say that it's a rule at all
(, Sun 23 Mar 2008, 21:16, archived)
# Ah, I see what you mean, fair enough
it does point out that about 600 pixels wide is about large enough for the board, and to be blunt, there is no need for a jpg to be larger than 50kb at that size under normal circumstances, this isn't an art gallery
(, Sun 23 Mar 2008, 21:23, archived)
# I think most of the people who make that mistake when they start do so because they don't know about the limit at all.
But yes, making it clearer wouldn't hurt.
(, Sun 23 Mar 2008, 21:07, archived)
# true
but i'd still feel awkward telling people that they must abide by an unwritten rule. if we're going to lay on the abuse when an image goes over 50k, the faq shouldn't be dithering around saying "well, you don't really need it to be more than 50k you know, um..."
(, Sun 23 Mar 2008, 21:20, archived)
# Yeah, I see what you mean.
I think the fact that people jump on the 'fuck off' bandwagon is a bigger problem.
When you're polite and tell them 50k is a general limit, they normally pay attention and at least make the next image smaller.
(, Sun 23 Mar 2008, 21:23, archived)
# i think you've hit the nail on the head
but i'm tired of telling people to play nice, especially if they genuinely think they're being helpful. if there's a simple way to give folks less reason to be nasty, i want it to happen
(, Sun 23 Mar 2008, 21:32, archived)
# I have no idea what could be done about it, people seem to enjoy the flaming.
But it must give this place an unfriendly appearance to new people.
(, Sun 23 Mar 2008, 21:34, archived)
# 'people seem to enjoy the flaming'
being the nail on the head
(, Sun 23 Mar 2008, 21:43, archived)