Well if you see the e-mail I sent them,I did offer to buy the whole lot.
(
Redsushi! Whoop! Whoop! Yes, that one!,
Sun 6 Apr 2008, 16:22,
archived)
"some of"not the same as "the lot"
probably talking about a lot of warehouse space here
(probably talking about a lot of warehouse space here
discomeats This canoe,
Sun 6 Apr 2008, 16:24,
archived)
Oh right.Sorry, that wasnt correctly transcribed.
I did actually offer to buy the lot from them. The blog thing was an afterthought and I had to transcribe it rather than copy and paste it.
(I did actually offer to buy the lot from them. The blog thing was an afterthought and I had to transcribe it rather than copy and paste it.
Redsushi! Whoop! Whoop! Yes, that one!,
Sun 6 Apr 2008, 16:31,
archived)
ahhI wonder how many 0's after the £1 that'd be
( discomeats This canoe,
Sun 6 Apr 2008, 16:41,
archived)
To be honest with youI dont think that would be a problem.
Once they agreed to sell it, then it would become an issue. But they wont, Im sure. Because they are cunts!
(Once they agreed to sell it, then it would become an issue. But they wont, Im sure. Because they are cunts!
Redsushi! Whoop! Whoop! Yes, that one!,
Sun 6 Apr 2008, 16:48,
archived)
oh, rich ehyou never know, they might
"I'll buy your old second hand game stuff you don't want to deal with anymore and assume complete liability for the lot of it"
they might ponder that, after all, they want the money and not the stuff
("I'll buy your old second hand game stuff you don't want to deal with anymore and assume complete liability for the lot of it"
they might ponder that, after all, they want the money and not the stuff
discomeats This canoe,
Sun 6 Apr 2008, 16:53,
archived)
But thats the thing.As far as I am aware, they are better off just destroying it as the money they have spent on it, they can write off, tax free. Whereas if they sell it on, they have to pay tax on the income.
( Redsushi! Whoop! Whoop! Yes, that one!,
Sun 6 Apr 2008, 18:13,
archived)