Nicely indeedThough I agree with her really.
There's no way of expanding on what the characters are without just ripping off what she's already written or making shit up.
If it wasn't a thesaurus of harry potter and was a story behind how she got the ideas for each animal or whatever they'd get away with it.
/boring as buggery blog
Quijibo Esq. BSc. May contain traces of nuts,
Tue 15 Apr 2008, 20:51,
archived)
i have no opinion either wayhave never read any of her words or seen any of her movies, i do know hermione is 18 now though.
(
god save the queen making another unremarkable comeback,
Tue 15 Apr 2008, 20:54,
archived)
In all fairness though, J K Rowling has admitted herself that she used the website to check up on the facts of her own novels at times.
This does become a much bigger case when you consider the implications of putting a website, and its content, into print....
(This does become a much bigger case when you consider the implications of putting a website, and its content, into print....
Redsushi! Whoop! Whoop! Yes, that one!,
Tue 15 Apr 2008, 21:27,
archived)