b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 8338259 (Thread)

# Pah astronomy's for losers.
We did particle. Particle FTW!
(, Fri 2 May 2008, 0:16, archived)
# Medical Physics is where the cool kids are at.
(, Fri 2 May 2008, 0:17, archived)
# Hahaha as if!
*points and laughs*
(, Fri 2 May 2008, 0:17, archived)
# Well on the plus side,
I do get to fairly regularly play with equipment costing around a million quid.
(, Fri 2 May 2008, 0:22, archived)
# Yeah well I get to picture things in my imagination!
/realises that's not as cool
(, Fri 2 May 2008, 0:25, archived)
# Fah, particle physics is for suckers.
Theoretical is where it's at.
(, Fri 2 May 2008, 0:19, archived)
# Theoretical shmeoretical.
I don't really like physics that much I just need the A-level so I can get to uni and start doing what I really like, biochemistry.
(, Fri 2 May 2008, 0:26, archived)
# One of my housemates through uni did some kind of chemistry, quite possibly bio.
He's now joining the police force.
(, Fri 2 May 2008, 0:29, archived)
# Well that's disheartening.
I could quite happily do that without going through 4 years of uni.
(, Fri 2 May 2008, 0:34, archived)
# His was only a 3 year course,
but uni is still well worth going to. Great fun, and if you do half decently it'll give you more options.
(, Fri 2 May 2008, 0:36, archived)
# Oh there's no doubt I'll go.
I just hope I'll get a worthwhile science job out of it at the end.
(, Fri 2 May 2008, 0:40, archived)
# I think I was pretty lucky to get on mine.
I recommend spending quite a while looking into things the summer before you finish your degree.
(, Fri 2 May 2008, 0:44, archived)
# Could you give me bell and remind me
about June 2013 please? Thanks in advance.
(, Fri 2 May 2008, 0:47, archived)
# I'll get right on it.
But, more importantly, I'm off to bed. Goodnight b3ta.
(, Fri 2 May 2008, 0:48, archived)
# Night.
(, Fri 2 May 2008, 0:51, archived)
# biochemistry's for chumps
you want to do astrophysics instead.

/hard sell blog
(, Fri 2 May 2008, 0:38, archived)
# Well you do argue a good point...
but as I've already got my place I think I'll stick with it. Keep plugging away though, you'll get 'em.
(, Fri 2 May 2008, 0:40, archived)
# bah
another one lost to those damned biochemists

actually i've only just finished marking a bunch of students' work and it felt like there were a million of them (there weren't, i only have 15) and it's twenty to two and i need to be at work at 9 so i think i'm going now...

PS do cosmology. It's like astronomy with all the irritating bits taken out, and particle physics with all the other irritating bits taken out.
(, Fri 2 May 2008, 0:42, archived)
# Twenty to two?
Where the blazes are you? Also, I don't belive in star signs so I don't think cosmology's for me :P
(, Fri 2 May 2008, 0:44, archived)
# hahaha
:D
(, Fri 2 May 2008, 2:47, archived)
# in my mind
particle physics is part of theoretical physics. experimental particle physics can fuck right off. it only leads to the lhc and the lhc is going to make little black holes that will consume the entire earth and then the universe*. it's true, i read it in the Telegraph a few years ago!**




* This won't happen. We may well not make mini black holes at all and if we do, so what?
** It may not have been the Telegraph but it was some paper that had a supplement "How we'll destroy ourselves in the next century" which included at number 2 or something stupidly high, mini black holes at the LHC gobbling up Earth and then the universe. The lack of understanding showed by their "science" "correspondant" was utterly staggering.
(, Fri 2 May 2008, 0:37, archived)
# Hahaha!
*click*
(, Fri 2 May 2008, 0:39, archived)
# It's about fucking time.
They've had god knows how many years to implode the earth somehow, about cocking time they actually got round to it.
(, Fri 2 May 2008, 0:41, archived)
# Damn straight
It's well overdue.
(, Fri 2 May 2008, 0:42, archived)