well... yes but there are genetic charachteristics within the main racial groups that are shared
there are clear distinctions between celts and saxons for example
( ,
Fri 6 Jun 2008, 23:37,
archived)
And that's when you hit ethnic groups.
To be honest I believe that there are obvious and recognisable traits in Cockneys and Cornishmen, let alone Big fucking groups like the ginger fucks and the Pict haters.
( ,
Sat 7 Jun 2008, 0:06,
archived)
I like to keep it simple.
genetics are what they are and are subject to nearly no change within out life span. Ethnicity is clearly a social outcome based upon the parameters in which we are raised and is easily changed by circumstance. A negroid will remain a negroid even if he is brought up in a strict catholic ( to find a caucasoid ethnic structure to use ) environment.
( ,
Sat 7 Jun 2008, 0:16,
archived)
yeah but I
clearly make a distinction between race and ethnicity and don't see them as interchangeable.
( ,
Sat 7 Jun 2008, 0:22,
archived)
Nor do I.
There are (for me) 3 races, but an almost limitless number of ethnic groups.
The Slavs, for example, I would consider an ethnic group, but not a separate race.
The Ginger, of course, are an entirely different kettle of fish.
Who puts fish in a fucking kettle anyway?
( ,
Sat 7 Jun 2008, 0:27,
archived)
The Slavs, for example, I would consider an ethnic group, but not a separate race.
The Ginger, of course, are an entirely different kettle of fish.
Who puts fish in a fucking kettle anyway?