b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » Message 8440065 (Thread)

# well... yes but there are genetic charachteristics within the main racial groups that are shared
there are clear distinctions between celts and saxons for example
(, Fri 6 Jun 2008, 23:37, archived)
# And that's when you hit ethnic groups.
To be honest I believe that there are obvious and recognisable traits in Cockneys and Cornishmen, let alone Big fucking groups like the ginger fucks and the Pict haters.
(, Sat 7 Jun 2008, 0:06, archived)
# I like to keep it simple.
genetics are what they are and are subject to nearly no change within out life span. Ethnicity is clearly a social outcome based upon the parameters in which we are raised and is easily changed by circumstance. A negroid will remain a negroid even if he is brought up in a strict catholic ( to find a caucasoid ethnic structure to use ) environment.
(, Sat 7 Jun 2008, 0:16, archived)
# I think you just agreed with me?
(, Sat 7 Jun 2008, 0:17, archived)
# yeah but I
clearly make a distinction between race and ethnicity and don't see them as interchangeable.
(, Sat 7 Jun 2008, 0:22, archived)
# Nor do I.
There are (for me) 3 races, but an almost limitless number of ethnic groups.

The Slavs, for example, I would consider an ethnic group, but not a separate race.

The Ginger, of course, are an entirely different kettle of fish.

Who puts fish in a fucking kettle anyway?
(, Sat 7 Jun 2008, 0:27, archived)
# Haha, you are just jealous because
I'm a proper Dane!
(, Sat 7 Jun 2008, 0:30, archived)
# don't you start!
There are no genetic distinctions beyond what prolonged environmental changes give each group. Celts and Saxons are the same race of northern Caucasoid who grew up on different sides of the North Sea.
(, Sat 7 Jun 2008, 0:08, archived)