
except i managed to get it sent to my home in shripshire... not london. good thing i'm going home soon :)
i got the time machine, cause i still havent read it. what did you get?
hold on... compendium does just mean book right?
or was it like a....thing?
( ,
Tue 17 Jun 2008, 2:18,
archived)
i got the time machine, cause i still havent read it. what did you get?
hold on... compendium does just mean book right?
or was it like a....thing?

i've got the war in the air which i'm reading atm, the time machine, the hisory of mister polly, the time machine and several others i can't read the titles of as they're on the other side of the room
( ,
Tue 17 Jun 2008, 2:20,
archived)

I recently went through a sci-fi phase and as well as some classics got around to reading most of Peter F Hamilton's books, which were pretty great
( ,
Tue 17 Jun 2008, 2:21,
archived)

i'm working on a victorian style novel at the moment and i'm trying to getting to that sort of scientific romance mindset
( ,
Tue 17 Jun 2008, 2:23,
archived)

back when they are called 'scientific romances' or something.
i'm reading Flatland soon, 1884 it was
it's more maths-fi though
i doubt that's a real genre name...
it's a story about maths though!
well... geomtery.
but still.
( ,
Tue 17 Jun 2008, 2:26,
archived)
i'm reading Flatland soon, 1884 it was
it's more maths-fi though
i doubt that's a real genre name...
it's a story about maths though!
well... geomtery.
but still.

it consists of 90% awesome and 10% deposited awesome solids.
i tell you what annoys me about sci-fi though
there's so much stuff out there, where they have a pretty cool idea, like Cube (or Cube 2: Hypercube.. actually basically the whole series) for example. but the scriptwriters just obviously have NO clue about how real people work, so the characters and plot developments are so... ugh.
i always find jules verne like that.
all his books seem to consists of are him reaming of a list of random facts he knows, a bit of semi-interesting plot, and then some wild fabrication of his.
impressive predictions sure, but as a story, and especially Now. yawn.
Orson Wells on the other hand. mo' like AWESOME WELLES!
i wish that was my joke there and then :(
( ,
Tue 17 Jun 2008, 2:37,
archived)
i tell you what annoys me about sci-fi though
there's so much stuff out there, where they have a pretty cool idea, like Cube (or Cube 2: Hypercube.. actually basically the whole series) for example. but the scriptwriters just obviously have NO clue about how real people work, so the characters and plot developments are so... ugh.
i always find jules verne like that.
all his books seem to consists of are him reaming of a list of random facts he knows, a bit of semi-interesting plot, and then some wild fabrication of his.
impressive predictions sure, but as a story, and especially Now. yawn.
Orson Wells on the other hand. mo' like AWESOME WELLES!
i wish that was my joke there and then :(

It's just no-one seems to mind when dramas are so cliched and poorly written than you want to shit your eyes out.
( ,
Tue 17 Jun 2008, 2:39,
archived)

drama is usually a bit more subtle, so there's never really any ridiculous premise to pull it all apart.
not that there's anything wrong with ridiculous premises of course, as long as you keep it consistent.
( ,
Tue 17 Jun 2008, 2:44,
archived)
not that there's anything wrong with ridiculous premises of course, as long as you keep it consistent.

The writing in that was really apalling, it wasn't as if he even got lured in by an elaborate and cunning Monte Cristo style plot he just suddenly went evil.
( ,
Tue 17 Jun 2008, 2:53,
archived)



he's currently writing a jacobean league of extraordinary gentlemen
( ,
Tue 17 Jun 2008, 3:13,
archived)

Surely the Victorian times was enough of a dislocation from the usual standards of superhero sagas, I can't see what making it Jacobean would add.
( ,
Tue 17 Jun 2008, 3:16,
archived)

I can't much see the point in copying Alan Moore's idea in such a fashion.
( ,
Tue 17 Jun 2008, 3:31,
archived)

For some reason I decided on the idea as a play, and I couldn't just have it exactly the same as the original star wars so I removed the future and made it one of the renaissance era wars in Italy to fit with the fact that it was a play better. That's pretty much it. I only ever wrote about one scene and then buggered off to do something more interesting, but the idea is still there.
( ,
Tue 17 Jun 2008, 3:37,
archived)

H.G. Wells strikes the balance right though i find.
( ,
Tue 17 Jun 2008, 2:40,
archived)

'[i wrote some detailed something] that would scarcely be of interest to the casual reader'
which is so perfectly true.
verne just seems to be showing off his technical knowledge, and forgets he's not writing a Big Book of Boys Facts, he's writing a Story.
( ,
Tue 17 Jun 2008, 2:43,
archived)
which is so perfectly true.
verne just seems to be showing off his technical knowledge, and forgets he's not writing a Big Book of Boys Facts, he's writing a Story.

"by a happy mingling of reasoning and intuition perculiar to her success she struck gold almost immediately. But the whole story of her submarine mining, intensely interesting though it is, must be told at some other time"
( ,
Tue 17 Jun 2008, 2:48,
archived)

So had to rein loads of the stuff in and just add them as amusing asides.
( ,
Tue 17 Jun 2008, 2:48,
archived)

When previously it was either only tenuously relevent or just came completely out of nowhere. And I just made the stuff more concise and to the point generally.
If it does ever get published and subsequently carries on to the potential series, I think I'll just have to put out a compendium of miscellania which has all the unfunny stuff in, like evolutionary paths, the creation of some of the weirder escher worlds and so on.
( ,
Tue 17 Jun 2008, 2:51,
archived)
If it does ever get published and subsequently carries on to the potential series, I think I'll just have to put out a compendium of miscellania which has all the unfunny stuff in, like evolutionary paths, the creation of some of the weirder escher worlds and so on.

Old MacDonald had a form: ei /\ ei = 0
/gets coat
( ,
Tue 17 Jun 2008, 2:31,
archived)
/gets coat

because you went fowards in a time machine and then forgot you already did it when you came back?
:)
( ,
Tue 17 Jun 2008, 2:22,
archived)
:)

i mean
oh dear i'm losing it a little bit....
my poor erection....
( ,
Tue 17 Jun 2008, 2:28,
archived)
oh dear i'm losing it a little bit....
my poor erection....