the Times went off on one as well, 'HER GRIEVING FAMILY', 'SHE WANTED TO SERVE', etc, etc...
I mean given that we're mired in two bloody middle eastern conflicts that have killed hundreds of thousands and displaced millions more, is the first female British casualty really that important?
The news coverage is beginning to remind me of those old world war one newpaper cuttings, 'OUR BRAVE LADS BEAT THE HUN' etc etc..
(,
Thu 19 Jun 2008, 16:39,
archived)
I mean given that we're mired in two bloody middle eastern conflicts that have killed hundreds of thousands and displaced millions more, is the first female British casualty really that important?
The news coverage is beginning to remind me of those old world war one newpaper cuttings, 'OUR BRAVE LADS BEAT THE HUN' etc etc..