True.
I'd say attending orgies, nazi or not, behind your wifes back is a pretty scummy thing to do though.
( ,
Tue 15 Jul 2008, 12:00,
archived)
I love the way
he blames the paper for upsetting his wife, though.
( ,
Tue 15 Jul 2008, 12:02,
archived)
Last time I checked, it wasn't against the law though
so this fucking witchhunt is pointless, needlessly invasive in terms of personal privacy and motivated by a complete lack of education in fetish and BDSM. It's a modern torch-and-pitchfork party and I find it sickening.
( ,
Tue 15 Jul 2008, 12:03,
archived)
I'm not saying he should lose his job over it, or that it's any of our business,
but I am saying he's a scumbag.
( ,
Tue 15 Jul 2008, 12:04,
archived)
I think it was more to do with
the Nazi element, being the son of Oswald and all that. And he's a Class 1 c*** anyway, long before this happened.
( ,
Tue 15 Jul 2008, 12:05,
archived)
The amount of people that use images
and costumes to do with Naziism in fetish is humungous though. Are they going to come and set a honey trap for the rest of us as well?
( ,
Tue 15 Jul 2008, 12:06,
archived)
I think the combination is the thing
And newspapers are scum anyway.
( ,
Tue 15 Jul 2008, 12:07,
archived)
the "behind his wife's back" bit is the shitty bit
consenting adults should be allowed to do what they like, if people find it offensive they don't have to join in or watch or even think about it...
( ,
Tue 15 Jul 2008, 12:04,
archived)
Of course,
I've always been from the 'ignore it if you don't like it' camp for anything that doesn't cause harm.
( ,
Tue 15 Jul 2008, 12:06,
archived)
I agree he's a grade A cunt though
but then - if we rounded up all of the grade A cunts and shot them into the sun there'd be no one left to run pretty much everything - and then I might have to do some of it.
( ,
Tue 15 Jul 2008, 12:08,
archived)
you should appoint
a continuous efficiency manager, set targets, produce management information...
( ,
Tue 15 Jul 2008, 12:14,
archived)