I'd go more for 'if you stare at a computer screen for extended sessions with epilepsy then you are a moron'.Christ, if you know something is going to set it off, why would you do it?
I'm allergic to some food colourings, so I don't eat foods that contain them. Going 'waaah waaah, I can't eat that food so nobody else should' is just pathetic.
(I'm allergic to some food colourings, so I don't eat foods that contain them. Going 'waaah waaah, I can't eat that food so nobody else should' is just pathetic.
gronkpan @vomitinglarry.bsky.social,
Tue 16 Sep 2008, 23:10,
archived)
For fucks sake fellapeople should have access to information and the internet (and a bit of mirth) without the potential risk of harm because someone posted something that may cause serious headaches or worse, entirely as Pasanonic outlined far above, it's not rocket science
It's simply pointless at the end of the day, i'm sure any of us could drag up some hideous stuff off the darkest corners of the net that would make the rest of us have a bad night's sleep or vomit
but why?
(It's simply pointless at the end of the day, i'm sure any of us could drag up some hideous stuff off the darkest corners of the net that would make the rest of us have a bad night's sleep or vomit
but why?
Jahled Three shades of black,
Tue 16 Sep 2008, 23:17,
archived)
I'm suggesting that the image above won't actually cause any epileptic symptoms.I think people just want to have something to complain about.
Also: if I'm one person and lots of other people are having fun but I'm unable to join in, I'll just let them have their fun rather than trying to stop it. It isn't at my expense if the fun keeps going after I turn the other cheek. It seems like the right thing to do is leave them be.
You know, being a grown up and all that.
(Also: if I'm one person and lots of other people are having fun but I'm unable to join in, I'll just let them have their fun rather than trying to stop it. It isn't at my expense if the fun keeps going after I turn the other cheek. It seems like the right thing to do is leave them be.
You know, being a grown up and all that.
gronkpan @vomitinglarry.bsky.social,
Tue 16 Sep 2008, 23:23,
archived)
None of this seems to be making any sense between us,so in all honestly i'm going to leave what has been said where it's been said
have a cool one Gronkpan! :)
(have a cool one Gronkpan! :)
Jahled Three shades of black,
Tue 16 Sep 2008, 23:37,
archived)
Because not doing it isn't goin to stop them coming across strobing images elsewhere.So the onus is on the viewer to control their browsing experience by disabling animated gifs.
( slight yoinks!,
Tue 16 Sep 2008, 23:23,
archived)