b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 8788208 (Thread)

# It's not 'sub-standard'
It's because girls means potentially more children, innit?
(I helped save b3ta! Je suis un vagabond is an unfunny, up your own arse middle class knob, Mon 29 Sep 2008, 13:06, archived)
# It's because boys have a better potential of bringing an income into the family unit
grandparents can't live off a girl.
(I helped save b3ta! gronkpan @vomitinglarry.bsky.social, Mon 29 Sep 2008, 13:08, archived)
# don't you go talking the same as me gronkpan! you know the rules!
we must fight! *raarrrwrrr, hiss, scratch*
(I helped save b3ta! HappyToast Groat froth, Mon 29 Sep 2008, 13:09, archived)
# *grabs folding chair and popcorn*
pleaser, continue.
(I helped save b3ta! Smash Monkey lowering the tone of the whole internet, Mon 29 Sep 2008, 13:11, archived)
# see
wimmin like it when blokies start mauling eachother

much as blokies like it when wimmin start mauling each other

I don't know where I'm going with this thought :D
(I helped save b3ta! discomeats This canoe, Mon 29 Sep 2008, 13:19, archived)
# for a mauling?
(I helped save b3ta! Smash Monkey lowering the tone of the whole internet, Mon 29 Sep 2008, 13:23, archived)
# One of the most interesting side effects of the one child policy
is the elimination of uncles, aunts, cousins, brothers and sisters from the majority of families, thus eliminating the social emphasis on family ties.
(I helped save b3ta! gronkpan @vomitinglarry.bsky.social, Mon 29 Sep 2008, 13:12, archived)
# Also:
I don't have a problem with how they run things. I'm glad I don't live there, but faced with the kind of overpopulation they have (thanks to mao), I think the one child policy was the most humane alternative. Invading Tibet? Also the lesser of two evils.
(I helped save b3ta! gronkpan @vomitinglarry.bsky.social, Mon 29 Sep 2008, 13:21, archived)
# I mean, they didn't have to be such dicks about it
but we're all human. All however many billion of us.
(I helped save b3ta! gronkpan @vomitinglarry.bsky.social, Mon 29 Sep 2008, 13:29, archived)
# it's because girls were/are second class citizens
and not as likely to make the family proud/rich or carry on the name.
(I helped save b3ta! HappyToast Groat froth, Mon 29 Sep 2008, 13:08, archived)
# not only that
chinese are still very hung up on the whole "honour" thing. sons bring honour, daughters don't, that's their view.
(I helped save b3ta! Smash Monkey lowering the tone of the whole internet, Mon 29 Sep 2008, 13:08, archived)