hahahahahahaI love vitriolic pack mentality ranting
How can you say TPM had bad CG?!
(How can you say TPM had bad CG?!
HappyToast Groat froth,
Wed 1 Oct 2008, 16:46,
archived)
hahaI swear on my grandmothers grave, I'm not following the pack here, I genuinely hated that film!
Oh come on Happytoast, it had terrible CGI! It was far too shiny and slick, looked like computer graphics. Compare it to Lord of the Rings, for example.
(Oh come on Happytoast, it had terrible CGI! It was far too shiny and slick, looked like computer graphics. Compare it to Lord of the Rings, for example.
Finite "Aardvark sorted out my shit!" on,
Wed 1 Oct 2008, 16:51,
archived)
NOTHING compares to Lord of The Rings.
Smash Monkey lowering the tone of the whole internet,
Wed 1 Oct 2008, 16:53,
archived)
for being utter shite?with some of the worst CG in the last 10 years?
That fucking elf running up the elephant was appalling, and don't get me started on the constant stretching errors whenever a "hobbit" was near a normal sized person
(That fucking elf running up the elephant was appalling, and don't get me started on the constant stretching errors whenever a "hobbit" was near a normal sized person
HappyToast Groat froth,
Wed 1 Oct 2008, 16:57,
archived)
the CG may have been more than a bit ropeybut the story itself is utter brilliance.
and with that, i'm off for my tea.
(and with that, i'm off for my tea.
Smash Monkey lowering the tone of the whole internet,
Wed 1 Oct 2008, 17:04,
archived)
I found the films a mess compared to the booksenjoy your tea, have cake with it, and more tea :)
( HappyToast Groat froth,
Wed 1 Oct 2008, 17:14,
archived)
Bollocks, the cg for the time was incrediblethe physics simulations on the pod race break up was insanely good, the space sequences equally so. It was a cg masterpiece at the time.
( HappyToast Groat froth,
Wed 1 Oct 2008, 16:59,
archived)