
..the unaltered image was one of first page hits when image googling for Frasier some time ago.
( ,
Thu 16 Oct 2008, 15:04,
archived)

..this makes me intrigued.
1. There is a Frasier rule that nobody refers to but with "fuck off".
2. A couple of bare chested men and an obvious cut/paste Frasier head is off limits? And nobody is able to formulate more extensively than "fuck off"?
3. If male chest skin considered as nudity is the issue (NSFW etc), nobody has made any other remarks about that. Except for the "fuck off".
Okay. I've seen quite a lot of pics with hookers and partly nude women over the years that never stir up this kind of strong emotions. But I might be reading this entire thing backwards. Dunno me. Glad I'm not gay anyway.
( ,
Thu 16 Oct 2008, 15:24,
archived)
1. There is a Frasier rule that nobody refers to but with "fuck off".
2. A couple of bare chested men and an obvious cut/paste Frasier head is off limits? And nobody is able to formulate more extensively than "fuck off"?
3. If male chest skin considered as nudity is the issue (NSFW etc), nobody has made any other remarks about that. Except for the "fuck off".
Okay. I've seen quite a lot of pics with hookers and partly nude women over the years that never stir up this kind of strong emotions. But I might be reading this entire thing backwards. Dunno me. Glad I'm not gay anyway.

It just seems a bit out of the blue. Nothing to do with the soft porn or the homosexuality. If he had been involved in some gay sex scandal I could understand (was he and I just don't know?). George Micheal for instance in a toilet or something. This just seems to be an unprovoked attack.
Other people might have different views but that is my take of it all.
( ,
Thu 16 Oct 2008, 15:36,
archived)
Other people might have different views but that is my take of it all.