LOOK AT THE FUN I'M HAVING ON THIS, MY SUNDAY EVENING AND FOR THE 5 DAYS PRECDING ITHe justified this with reference to David Hume’s discussion of the is/ought gap, which states that normative “ought” statements cannot be derived from facts or actions, and as such allows the removal of all extraneous information surrounding laws and access to the untainted arrangement of the legal system.
(
Tom OBedlam I have control of a tank,
Sun 16 Nov 2008, 21:47,
archived)
I quite liked Hume.I like the way he seems to argue against just about everything.
(
my other username is a porsche , posting shit pictures so you don't have to,
Sun 16 Nov 2008, 21:49,
archived)
hume is aceits Kelsen and Dworkin i'm having issues with.
and not the fun "all penatrative sex is rape" Dworkin. this is the "Law becomes valid not simply because it has been put in place by all or nothing rules, it also requires an extra internal dimension of moral analysis." Dworkin
(and not the fun "all penatrative sex is rape" Dworkin. this is the "Law becomes valid not simply because it has been put in place by all or nothing rules, it also requires an extra internal dimension of moral analysis." Dworkin
Tom OBedlam I have control of a tank,
Sun 16 Nov 2008, 21:54,
archived)
Sounds like laugh a minute stuff. my other username is a porsche , posting shit pictures so you don't have to,
Sun 16 Nov 2008, 22:03,
archived)
How wonderfully confusing your statement is :D
Redsushi! Whoop! Whoop! Yes, that one!,
Sun 16 Nov 2008, 21:52,
archived)