Right.Tomatos with fish genes.
Any evidence - at all - that there is anything actually wrong with that?
Granted, it's a bit weird, but what the fuck - so is fucking Quorn.
(Any evidence - at all - that there is anything actually wrong with that?
Granted, it's a bit weird, but what the fuck - so is fucking Quorn.
J Peasemould Gruntfuttock Alpha Mike Foxtrot,
Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:12,
archived)
unfortunately, it's the converse that's the problemAny evidence - at all - that there is anything nothing actually wrong with that?
(,
Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:16,
archived)
No. That simply doesn't work.Merely because people are unsettled by the concept doesn't make it wrong.
( J Peasemould Gruntfuttock Alpha Mike Foxtrot,
Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:18,
archived)
that's not what i'm trying to say. From a scientific point of view(ignoring the whale huggers views) there must be nothing wrong.
another way to put what I am trying to say is: everything must be right.
(,
Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:34,
archived)
another way to put what I am trying to say is: everything must be right.
I'm not saying tomato with fish genes is wrong - I'm citing it as an example of GM, to illustrate the cross-pollination aspect.
Je suis un vagabond is an unfunny, up your own arse middle class knob,
Mon 9 Feb 2009, 13:16,
archived)