so sweetbut im nosey why not a gif or jpg as i have no idea what else there is
(
boff FL OZ,
Wed 11 Feb 2009, 14:16,
archived)
with pngs you can have high quality transparancyyou cant with jpegs and with gifs the quality is plop
(,
Wed 11 Feb 2009, 14:17,
archived)
oh that'll be the alpha transparency thenmuch better than binary*
*according to the internets
(*according to the internets
boff FL OZ,
Wed 11 Feb 2009, 14:22,
archived)
^This^It would have worked fine if the redness was removed but I really liked how it looked, and I thought a square block of white around it (JPG style) altho rescuing the shading, it woulda spoilt the 'sitting on my screen' effect.
Still, it's still half the recommended high end for an animation, so I figured it was middle ground and I'd get away with it if I said sorry! ;)
(Still, it's still half the recommended high end for an animation, so I figured it was middle ground and I'd get away with it if I said sorry! ;)
..wil,
Wed 11 Feb 2009, 14:27,
archived)
because he wantedit to be transparent around the edges. Dong this in gif reduces the quality as gif can't cope well with transparent gradients. Doing it as jpg removes the transparency so doing it as png breaks the board and he needs a spanking ;)
(
Pasanonic 's been known to cause insanity in laboratory mice,
Wed 11 Feb 2009, 14:37,
archived)