YesIt wasn't an entirely bad tome by Stephen King.
(
riverghost servicing your mum since,
Wed 25 Mar 2009, 8:52,
archived)
ROFL!They are making a new film of It apparently.
(
Redsushi! Whoop! Whoop! Yes, that one!,
Wed 25 Mar 2009, 8:54,
archived)
But there's so many books that could be made into films from that era.Personally I'd give me left bottock to see a properly done version of Stranger in a Strange Land.
It only made it into the top ten books written in the last century, which is probably why it won't be made into a film. Too high brow.
(It only made it into the top ten books written in the last century, which is probably why it won't be made into a film. Too high brow.
riverghost servicing your mum since,
Wed 25 Mar 2009, 9:00,
archived)
I dunno.I read a Stephen King book once. It was shit.
( Redsushi! Whoop! Whoop! Yes, that one!,
Wed 25 Mar 2009, 9:05,
archived)
By R A HeinleinOriginally written in the sixties and was censored by just under 400 pages.
here
(here
riverghost servicing your mum since,
Wed 25 Mar 2009, 9:08,
archived)
Make sure it's the unabridged version though.I must have read it about ten times.
EDIT: The unabridged version was only release as when he died it meant that the publishers no longer belonded to the publishers but to his widow who found the orginal manuscript and published it.
(EDIT: The unabridged version was only release as when he died it meant that the publishers no longer belonded to the publishers but to his widow who found the orginal manuscript and published it.
riverghost servicing your mum since,
Wed 25 Mar 2009, 9:13,
archived)
It dealt with the second coming, saints, godand too communion literally so dealt with canibalism. I think mainly though it dealt with a concept that pissed off organised faiths the most. That 'thou art God' that god is within one's self and not in a church.
( riverghost servicing your mum since,
Wed 25 Mar 2009, 9:27,
archived)