
Despite the viking, i've always wondered why they bothered with the Dewbacks to get anywhere on Tattooine; I mean they had AT-STs and other walkers that would appear to have mean much quicker, in the belly of the Star Destroyers above them
/I am a nerd
( ,
Fri 10 Apr 2009, 20:54,
archived)
/I am a nerd

Giant geckos would have been better.
Loving your leopard pics btw.
( ,
Fri 10 Apr 2009, 20:56,
archived)
Loving your leopard pics btw.

And cool, should be up there again on Monday with a film maker who I took pictures for for his website: www.adriancale.co.uk/ :)
( ,
Fri 10 Apr 2009, 20:59,
archived)


Plus sand is always shifting - maybe the balance systems couldn't adapt to such an unstable, fluidic surface like sand.
Plus, the air conditioning in those things is probably rubbish.
Plus, AT-STs are expensive. Think they'd waste the cash on a backwater planet like Tatooine?
Hovervehicles, though, like Luke's skimmer, would be useful.
( ,
Fri 10 Apr 2009, 20:57,
archived)
Plus, the air conditioning in those things is probably rubbish.
Plus, AT-STs are expensive. Think they'd waste the cash on a backwater planet like Tatooine?
Hovervehicles, though, like Luke's skimmer, would be useful.

A Star Destroyer carry twenty AT-AT walkers, thirty AT-ST scout walkers, and 9,700 ground troops; there were at least two in orbit over Tattooine, plus they would have spared no expenses finding those droids
( ,
Fri 10 Apr 2009, 21:03,
archived)

after intercepting Leia's ship. Plus, those troopers shown on dewbacks might be the regular stationed troops who use dewbacks all the time so stick with the transport they know works. The outtakes might feature loads of walkers all over the planet slipping and sliding about in the sand.
( ,
Fri 10 Apr 2009, 21:08,
archived)