I always wonder whether it's better in this kind of case for the bloke to die rather than needing the expense of a trial and imprisonment.I suppose it depends on whether you see the purpose of punishment as rehabilitation, protection of the public or retribution.
Judging from his actions, his side of the story might not have been that coherent
(Judging from his actions, his side of the story might not have been that coherent
my other username is a porsche , posting shit pictures so you don't have to,
Fri 1 May 2009, 17:23,
archived)
Sir, you make a bloody good point.I just get this 'red mist of revenge' for crap like this.
(
J Peasemould Gruntfuttock Alpha Mike Foxtrot,
Fri 1 May 2009, 17:25,
archived)
Understandable.There's probably no right answer, I just find it interesting
( my other username is a porsche , posting shit pictures so you don't have to,
Fri 1 May 2009, 17:27,
archived)
This is almost always the dilemmaI think some families would've really liked to get some answers.
/hasstudiedlawblog
(/hasstudiedlawblog
mediocre ha ha ha, you're reading this,
Fri 1 May 2009, 17:46,
archived)
Wanting answers is quite understandable, but I have no idea how often a criminal will give those reasons to the victim/families afterwards.It's a little more suspect to want someone to languish in jail for the rest of their life at great expense rather than go quietly.
I'm not talking about capital punishment, more cases like this and when criminals commit suicide before facing justice.
/partofmydegreewasinPhilosophyblog
(I'm not talking about capital punishment, more cases like this and when criminals commit suicide before facing justice.
/partofmydegreewasinPhilosophyblog
my other username is a porsche , posting shit pictures so you don't have to,
Fri 1 May 2009, 17:50,
archived)
I understand, and I share your interest in this matter/bestpartofthisstudywasphilosophyoflawblog ;)
mediocre ha ha ha, you're reading this,
Fri 1 May 2009, 18:06,
archived)