Most certainly not 'lone' on this, sir.Damn silly, impossible-to-implement idea which will cost a fortune.
(
J Peasemould Gruntfuttock Alpha Mike Foxtrot,
Wed 6 May 2009, 14:13,
archived)
but, there are apparently no savings to be made by scrapping itbecause the projected cost (~£3bn) isn't funded by the taxpayer - it's funded by...the public!
a) £3bn is the apparent cost to the Home Office only. Nobody knows what it will cost to any other govt department (should any of them actually be interested)
b) the public are generally taxpayers
(a) £3bn is the apparent cost to the Home Office only. Nobody knows what it will cost to any other govt department (should any of them actually be interested)
b) the public are generally taxpayers
Mighty Nibus who dares gins | @nibus,
Wed 6 May 2009, 14:18,
archived)
Yes, indeed,That's the the worst of it. hence 'will cost a fortune'.
I don't recall getting a vote on this, either....
Hmmmm *ponders*
(I don't recall getting a vote on this, either....
Hmmmm *ponders*
J Peasemould Gruntfuttock Alpha Mike Foxtrot,
Wed 6 May 2009, 14:22,
archived)