I have the Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 USM MacroIn my opinion, it is the most difficult lens to get used to. But once you get the hang of it, it produces great shots.
www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Canon-EF-100mm-f-2.8-USM-Macro-Lens-Review.aspx
(www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Canon-EF-100mm-f-2.8-USM-Macro-Lens-Review.aspx
mediocre ha ha ha, you're reading this,
Sat 8 Aug 2009, 22:02,
archived)
Ah cool, that site is quite accurate for his reviews IMOmight just take the plunge with this, I tried the 180mm f/3.5 and realized it was simply impossible without a tripod. 2.8 seems nice and tight as well for something that price; sharp handheld?
(
Jahled Three shades of black,
Sat 8 Aug 2009, 22:11,
archived)
Quite sharp. It's even a great lens for portraits, if I have to believe some of my friends who use it more often.But DoF is so shallow, a mere heartbeat could bring you into the fuzzy spheres.
I did all mine without my tripod, but I have no doubt it would be better to use it in most cases.
mediocre ha ha ha, you're reading this,
Sat 8 Aug 2009, 22:18,
archived)
Thanks mate :)I think I will give this a go, seems quite affordable
( Jahled Three shades of black,
Sat 8 Aug 2009, 22:31,
archived)
Yeah, mine was an 'impulse buy' tooFriend phoned me at work that they were going to the shop right then, and if I also wanted one, I'd better decide in the next ten minutes ;-)
mediocre ha ha ha, you're reading this,
Sat 8 Aug 2009, 22:35,
archived)