In an overbearing "I'm great and deserve to win" sort of way.I'm not purposefully trying to be cuntish, but from my perspective, you're not coming off well.
(
Ttssattsr,
Fri 21 Aug 2009, 19:53,
archived)
how have I said I deserve to win?I said if I win (based on my fortuitous position at the end of the first week and nothing else)
(
HappyToast Groat froth,
Fri 21 Aug 2009, 19:55,
archived)
when I'm clicking other peoples I have clicked my ownI do not deny it :)
everyone loves a wank :D
(everyone loves a wank :D
HappyToast Groat froth,
Fri 21 Aug 2009, 21:45,
archived)
truei've done the same to test whether or not it counts and it doesn't seem to anyway :D
not trying to have a go at you.. just making an observation.
(not trying to have a go at you.. just making an observation.
elbow,
Fri 21 Aug 2009, 21:56,
archived)
I assumed it didn'tit's kind of therpeutic though, like trying to help a backward child up a hill :D
( HappyToast Groat froth,
Fri 21 Aug 2009, 22:37,
archived)
it's slightly ironic toosince he could probably post a seamy turd and still make the popular page :p
No need to worry anyway. The campaign people pick the winners irrespective of where they finish in the compo.
(,
Fri 21 Aug 2009, 19:58,
archived)
No need to worry anyway. The campaign people pick the winners irrespective of where they finish in the compo.
that's right, 12 pictures since wednesdayand every one of them on popular
( HappyToast Groat froth,
Fri 21 Aug 2009, 20:01,
archived)
no need to take literallymy point was merely that certain names appear more clickable on here, ie 'vote rigging and friend voting'. I'm sure I've even seen you commenting on it yourself.
Anyway, like I said, no need to worry as your images are likely in the vicinity of what they are looking for, and they choose not clicks.
(,
Fri 21 Aug 2009, 20:05,
archived)
Anyway, like I said, no need to worry as your images are likely in the vicinity of what they are looking for, and they choose not clicks.