For the most part I'd say wikipedia is actually very goodEspecially on technical definitions
(
zoldergoose,
Thu 22 Oct 2009, 11:50,
archived)
Aye. For computing terminology and breakdowns of how they work it's the best around still.
Quijibo Esq. BSc. May contain traces of nuts,
Thu 22 Oct 2009, 11:52,
archived)
I believe a study a few years ago demonstrated thatWikipedia beat traditional Encyclopedias in terms of accuracy.
(
chenobble rocking his explorer beard on,
Thu 22 Oct 2009, 12:16,
archived)
SHHHdont ruin outmoded stereotypes
(
yanmania... last shagged your mum on,
Thu 22 Oct 2009, 12:30,
archived)