
This entire thread is fictional.
Which should not detract from the original beauty of the slop work!
(said bird could spread it's legs across MILES of wire, if it is still not grounded to earth, no shorting effect)
( ,
Wed 27 Jan 2010, 3:02,
archived)
Which should not detract from the original beauty of the slop work!
(said bird could spread it's legs across MILES of wire, if it is still not grounded to earth, no shorting effect)

Ok, on a wire... if you put a meter across a section of wire with a current going through it, you will indeed get a potential difference regardless of grounding. Cos wires aren't superconducting.
That's what I learned at skool =)
( ,
Wed 27 Jan 2010, 3:13,
archived)
That's what I learned at skool =)

Then you can start the math for the incidence of lethality
I hope you are more learned than me as you are hopefully the future.. any hoo, my bed calleth, g'night :)
( ,
Wed 27 Jan 2010, 3:16,
archived)
I hope you are more learned than me as you are hopefully the future.. any hoo, my bed calleth, g'night :)

and bird vs steel your more likely to get a current excited in the birds (magneticaly premiable) body resulting from the magnetic field surrounding the cable, than from the diference in distance of its legs on the wire when it lands.
( ,
Wed 27 Jan 2010, 3:25,
archived)

uhmm and are very wet with some kind of juices
edit nn mikenco
( ,
Wed 27 Jan 2010, 3:27,
archived)
edit nn mikenco

Resistivity = 11.8 × 10-6 Ωcm" for steel at 0c
resitance of a dead chicken (Frozen) over the aproximate distance of a starling groin = thats not really fair i mean its forzen and full of water. im going to have to put an ohmeter over a birds groin while its still alive to find out. this is how scientology wins so many arguments. its because people just cant be bothered to refute such atupid claims. Im going to make myself a gin and orange and sulk. and let you win the argument i was having with myself.
( ,
Wed 27 Jan 2010, 3:40,
archived)
resitance of a dead chicken (Frozen) over the aproximate distance of a starling groin = thats not really fair i mean its forzen and full of water. im going to have to put an ohmeter over a birds groin while its still alive to find out. this is how scientology wins so many arguments. its because people just cant be bothered to refute such atupid claims. Im going to make myself a gin and orange and sulk. and let you win the argument i was having with myself.