
That is dangerous.
( , Tue 9 Dec 2014, 20:10, Reply)

Christ. It's not even a battle.
My "morality" doesn't mind contributing fairly to a pot that makes healthcare available for anyone should they need it. Your morality says people should pay for themselves and the people who inevitably can't afford to pay because of the top to bottom narrowness of that kind of system should suffer the consequences. That's not even getting to the hypocrisy of the gun problem your country's hideous "Constitution" has created.
It's not about superior/inferior - one is compassionate and morally correct the other is incredibly selfish and not in line with how a first world country should function. I can't convince you to change your idea of morality, but I can expose it for the heartless wasteland it purports.
( , Tue 9 Dec 2014, 20:27, Reply)

Your morality seems like the people who see a poor person and think "I don't want to touch the smelly rat, but I feel slightly guilty, so everyone should be forced by the police power to pitch in to assuage my guilt" Sometimes what a person needs isn't a handout, it's an arm around.
As to the Constitution, it is the law of the land, created to protect from government tyranny, not create a welfare state. The US has spent $20 Trillion fighting the war on poverty and there are more poor than ever. How is it working where you are? Are there poor? Is there crime? Are there no complaints about your health system?
You seem so intolerant of other people's views I'm surprised you can abide the vast religious, social and racial palate found today in most countries. Believe it or not, there are people who think differently from you; who help the poor through many charitable and religious entities because government tends to muck it up very badly.
Step outside your little world. It's a wonderful place.
( , Tue 9 Dec 2014, 21:08, Reply)

But I have enjoyed these sparring matches.
( , Tue 9 Dec 2014, 21:13, Reply)