Because I can see there is a problem, and I have the temerity to point out there is a problem,
and the sense to see that the problem is somewhat more specific than just "humans are cunts", but this is problematic for those who want to pretend that there is no problem.
(
Prufrock Lucifer, son of the morning!, Sat 14 Feb 2015, 19:23,
Reply)
Oh how blind we are oh master
Please lift this misty veil from our eyes
Your argument is "X is the problem" and if someone disagrees then you think they are saying there is no problem.
I agree there is a problem, and I think you are part of it.
(
A Rory Borealis here under duress, Sat 14 Feb 2015, 19:28,
Reply)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circular_reasoning
(
A Rory Borealis here under duress, Sat 14 Feb 2015, 19:33,
Reply)
Unfortunately that problem seems to be an ultra conservative interpretation of Islam whose clerics command obediance from the Saudi ruling elite and society at large
which is going to make tackling that problem a bit tricky as long as oil prices fuel our economies, and that oil wealth from Saudi Arabia is going overseas spreading the good word of Wahhabism, turning relatively normal people into psychotic nutters
(
Jahled Three shades of black, Sat 14 Feb 2015, 19:34,
Reply)
There is very little room for interpretation of Islam, it's central credo is established as literal,
interpretation is vehemently and emphatically discouraged in its source text.
(
Prufrock Lucifer, son of the morning!, Sat 14 Feb 2015, 19:42,
Reply)
He is pointing out intolerance
Whilst being intolerant
(
A Rory Borealis here under duress, Sat 14 Feb 2015, 19:29,
Reply)
So we should tolerate the intolerant?
we should embrace those who reject the very tolerance that permits them to practise their own intolerance? You're nuts.
(
Prufrock Lucifer, son of the morning!, Sat 14 Feb 2015, 19:34,
Reply)
Yes we should tolerate them
up until the point that they break the law, and then we should lock them up.
(
A Rory Borealis here under duress, Sat 14 Feb 2015, 20:07,
Reply)