This isn't really a problem though
Persons of No Fixed Abode already have a procedure to enrol on the Electoral Register. There's no reason to change that.
As for your final sentence, maybe so and I'd support that. There's plenty of evidence that suggests that locking people up is counterproductive with regard to preventing reoffending. However that's unlikely to be acted upon in the near future due to such ideas being deemed politically unpalateable.
(
wheresthefish Partly filled with wrong, Wed 13 May 2015, 23:34,
Reply)
OK mate.
I'll send Mark Bridger and Ian Huntley round to babysit your daughters next time you fancy a curry. Or maybe just fuck those full life tariffs and move them into the bail hostel in your neighbourhood, rather than their "home constituencies". As long as your delusional ideologies remain intact, that's the main thing. Never mind realities, practicalities and the dark side of human nature. Enjoy your dopiaza.
(
Prufrock Lucifer, son of the morning!, Wed 13 May 2015, 23:52,
Reply)
Are those two locked up for punishment or public protection?
A weak Straw Man argument coupled with an Ad Hominem. I think this conversation has reached its conclusion.
(
wheresthefish Partly filled with wrong, Thu 14 May 2015, 0:24,
Reply)
Niether are in a mental hospital prison, therefore they're in there for punishment.
They will get out if they live long enough. Votes for Broadmoor! is there always a clear dichotomy between protection of the public and punishment? Is rehabilitation always possible? Is the world as black and white as your ideologies?
(
Prufrock Lucifer, son of the morning!, Thu 14 May 2015, 1:44,
Reply)