b3ta.com links
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » links » Link 1323834 | Random (Thread)

This is a normal post Here are a few pertinent facts.
"How is it that NASA’s images of Pluto, supposedly taken from 9 million miles away, are of a poorer quality than those he took of Jupiter with his telescope from 484 million miles away?

1. The New Horizons cameras are optimised for a relatively close fly-by, not pics from 9 million miles away.

2. The light falling on Pluto is very dim, orders of magnitude dimmer than Jupiter.

3. Pluto is REALLY small, smaller even than Earth's Moon.

4. Jupiter is VERY big. Nearly 70 times the diameter of Pluto.
(, Tue 21 Jul 2015, 15:57, Reply)
This is a normal post This is no time for reason. The lizard people love Burbank.

(, Tue 21 Jul 2015, 16:17, Reply)
This is a normal post and also New Horizons was launched on January 19, 2006. where camera quality was a lot lower than it is today!!!
but you'll always get the doubting idiots to poo poo someone's work.
religious nuts I'd say!!!
(, Tue 21 Jul 2015, 17:55, Reply)