> he is much less interfering in his news outlets editorial line than it is widely claimed. His primary concern is, and always has been, ratings and circulation because that's where the money is.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newcomb's_paradox
(
artifus is doing it all wrong, Fri 17 Feb 2017, 0:28,
Share,
Reply)
I'm not predicting the future, I'm basing what I say on his past actions.
If he is so interfering in his media empire's editorial line, please explain why The Sun was staunchly pro Leave, yet The Times was staunchly pro Remain, and The Sunday Times was pro Remain, albeit in a rather lukewarm way, while Sky News was a bit schizophrenic on the matter. He was openly pro Leave.
(
Prufrock Lucifer, son of the morning!, Fri 17 Feb 2017, 0:37,
Share,
Reply)
i was suggesting murdoch plays the game of 'predicting' the future, not you
(
artifus is doing it all wrong, Fri 17 Feb 2017, 0:42,
Share,
Reply)
Well, if you weren't so gnomic and obtuse all the time, I might not have got the wrong end of the stick.
I think he's a "let's wait and see and stick or twist as late as we can" kind of chap. He rarely backs the wrong horse in politics, but in politics there isn't a croupier calling "Les jeux sont faits", so he can take his time.
(
Prufrock Lucifer, son of the morning!, Fri 17 Feb 2017, 0:51,
Share,
Reply)
good link!
I'n going to read it again when I haven;t been drinking since down tools.
(
The Ann Coulter Fan Club Babylon is burning at, Fri 17 Feb 2017, 0:40,
Share,
Reply)