
You have no opinion on the proposed changes? Good or bad?
Come on it's your beloved EU, can't you defend them on this topic?
( , Wed 4 Jul 2018, 15:39, Reply)

I refer the honorable gentleman to his previous post on this subject where I said that it's pretty much a non-starter and impossible to enforce.
So, although it's bad (tm) it doesn't matter.
( , Wed 4 Jul 2018, 16:19, Reply)

Article 11 and 13 are about as precisely written and enforceable as GDPR.
( , Wed 4 Jul 2018, 16:27, Reply)

I would argue that vague laws are very dangerous.
And as for being unenforceable the EU is making that the problem of the hosts to solve.
Rather than go over old arguments here's one of them wide eyed EU optimists that's put together everything that's bad about it.
juliareda.eu/eu-copyright-reform/censorship-machines/
Anyway, just thought I would share with the class that the next stage of this law is being voted on tomorrow.
( , Wed 4 Jul 2018, 16:51, Reply)

"should only be expected to expeditiously remove specific unauthorised works and other subject matter upon notification by rightholders"... unless you're Google or Facebook? Given the love the EU has for Google it wouldn't be surprising if this is aimed more squarely at them. Genuinely interested in your thoughts.
( , Wed 4 Jul 2018, 17:27, Reply)

Here's the full text for that section.
"(38e) The measures taken by the online content sharing service providers to prevent the availability of unauthorised works or other subject-matter should be effective but remain proportionate, in particular with regard to the size of the online content sharing service provider. While this
Directive is expected to foster the development of effective technologies on the market, the availability of the measures may differ according to the type of content for which the measures are applied. Having regard to the technological developments in line with industry best practices, those measures should consequently ensure a level of efficiency appropriate to the amount and the type of works or other subject matter uploaded by the users of the services. For the purposes of assessing the proportionality of measures to be taken by the online content sharing service providers, the state of the art of existing technologies for the different types of content as well as the size of the services should be taken into account notably whether they are small and micro enterprises. Different measures may be appropriate and proportionate per type of content and itIt is therefore not excluded that in some cases unauthorised content may only be avoided upon notification of rightholders. The measures should be proportionate in order to avoid imposing disproportionately complicated or costly obligations on certain online content sharing service providers, taking into account notably their small size. In particular, small and micro enterprises as defined in Title I of the Annex to Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC, should be expected to be subject to less burdensome obligations than larger service providers. Therefore, taking into account the state of the art and the availability of technologies and their costs, in specific cases it may not be proportionate to expect small and micro enterprises to apply preventive measures and that therefore in such cases these enterprises should only be expected to expeditiously remove specific unauthorised works and other subject matter upon notification by rightholders."
If I could understand all of the above I would have chosen a different career path. But as far as I can make out from people a lot smarter than me in this regards it's still pretty bad news and becomes a startup killer. Depending on where the bar is set if you start to become competition you get this burden regulation slapped on you. So rather than being against Google and facebook it stops a competitor growing.
But say you are small fry. Is you work hosted on imgr, wordpress, Adobe, facebook, instagram etc? They'll be filtering all your uploads of images, text, audio for possible breaches. So it will still kill your site.
( , Wed 4 Jul 2018, 17:48, Reply)

I don't think it's a good idea in any shape or form.
( , Thu 5 Jul 2018, 10:31, Reply)

Paul McCartney is down to his last 820 million quid so if we could all just change the law in his favour to extend his copyright (not for the first time), that'd be great. Peg leg turned out to be a real gold digger and the maintenance is killing him.
( , Wed 4 Jul 2018, 16:28, Reply)

You:
- this decision is bad
- the legislature is evil
- the forrins are all against us
People who understand:
- I disagree with this legislation, this has happened many times in my life, but understand that I am not the only person on the planet and some people think differently to me
- the concept of intra-national cooperation is sound and generally results in better outcomes for us all than narrow nationalistic self-interest
- I would prefer not to experience a 10 year recession
( , Thu 5 Jul 2018, 9:52, Reply)

( , Thu 5 Jul 2018, 10:56, Reply)

Anyway I thought you were all for listening to experts?
www.eff.org/files/2018/06/13/article13letter.pdf
( , Thu 5 Jul 2018, 11:05, Reply)

You know that pretty much every person who's signed that letter thinks the UK leaving the EU is a stupid idea. Because nearly everyone with a professional qualification does, nearly everyone who has to attend international seminars does, nearly everyone who talks or thinks about things for a living or knows anything about how the world around them works does.
( , Thu 5 Jul 2018, 11:15, Reply)

Anyway you're free to say it's a bad law now without upsetting the eu's feelings because it's just been rejected.
www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/european-copyright-laws-memes-link-tax-article-13-11-a8432486.html
Now if we can only get out before they try something like this again that would be nice.
( , Thu 5 Jul 2018, 11:29, Reply)

the decision went your way and you still feel persecuted. There is literally nothing they could do that would convince you that this otherness you feel is all in your head
( , Thu 5 Jul 2018, 11:36, Reply)

Well yes because it was a close thing.
And sadly it looks like it's not over.
"In practice, the vote only delays the final decision on the rules and gives the European Parliament more time to deliberate on them. Another decision will be taken in September."
Shall we pick this up in a couple of months?
( , Thu 5 Jul 2018, 11:49, Reply)

Get back to the newt thing again, I preferred all that
( , Thu 5 Jul 2018, 11:57, Reply)

I like the internet, I take offence when people try to fuck it over.
Btw 278 for it 318 against 31 abstaining and they get to vote again in September. What is it about the EU that makes people want to keep voting on the same thing until people vote the right way?
Anyway tata for now benny!
( , Thu 5 Jul 2018, 12:00, Reply)

Could you quantify it? How many millions unemployed? How many quarters of negative growth? That sort of thing
( , Thu 5 Jul 2018, 12:17, Reply)

where the bill is passed to and from lower and upper house, you know, democracy. Except the upper house in the EU is elected.
( , Thu 5 Jul 2018, 14:15, Reply)

I'll just have to keep being a boring sod complaining about it until they stop trying to pass it.
( , Thu 5 Jul 2018, 14:31, Reply)

You:
- patronising cunt
People who understand:
- yes he is
( , Thu 5 Jul 2018, 18:21, Reply)

( , Thu 5 Jul 2018, 19:03, Reply)