I concur.
I have no interest in religion however.
By concur, I mean there are certain religious 'facts' stated in the film which are very difficult to prove.
The last two 'sections' are the most important.
Please enlighten me as to which parts are 'ill-informed'.
(
(|D[ekionplexis B3ta.com: fictional child porn is OK, Sat 12 Jan 2008, 23:42,
Reply)
'sun's god'
or 'sun of the god' being etymologically related to 'son of god'... that's uh... that's an English thing, doesn't work in other languages, sorry to break it to you, but other languages are different.
I take all such videos with a pinch of salt, I take everything with a pinch of salt, my blood pressure is through the roof.
But if people discard religion and then go and base their beliefs on a youtube video, uh... watch out for them. Remember, be wary of everything, even, nay, especially your nan.
(, Sun 13 Jan 2008, 0:14, Reply)
Watch the whole thing, after the 'religion' section it gets far more interesting.
(
(|D[ekionplexis B3ta.com: fictional child porn is OK, Sun 13 Jan 2008, 0:16,
Reply)
Hah, conspiracy theories may be strong
but laziness is stronger!
I've seen big chunks of it before, very interesting, but I have an innate distrust of preachy people.
(, Sun 13 Jan 2008, 0:19, Reply)