No shit sherlock
Is any picture what you see with your eyes? You said "False colour" - OK, show me a true one. Anything, ever. Any pic that actually looks identical to real life. Go on, I'll wait.
(, Sun 29 Jul 2018, 22:28, Reply)
Dude,
They arbitrarily chose a colour to represent specific elements.
You're now claiming photographs don't look identical to real life?
Ignoring facts and calling people who don't comply with your simplistic views silly names might get you elected in the US, but that shit doesn't fly here.
(
Tusk knows where you live, Sun 29 Jul 2018, 22:39,
Reply)
Show me a photo that looks the same as what I see with my eyes
Cockwomble
PS I'm English
(, Sun 29 Jul 2018, 22:52, Reply)
You really can't take criticism can you? That's a false colour image. No amount of whatabouts is going to change that.
I don't have the equipment here to prove it, but I'd be willing to bet good money that a photo out my window by my DSLR would look a fuckload closer to real life than one created by stacked hydrogen, sodium and oxygen filters.
(
evil_andy Stick stick stick stick sticky sticky stick stick, Sun 29 Jul 2018, 22:48,
Reply)
"I don't have the equipment here to prove it"
ie I'm talking shite; I have zero evidence, but here's what I chinny-reckon.
(, Sun 29 Jul 2018, 22:54, Reply)
Straight from the Donald J. Trump school for debating.
You need to seek professionel help. Seriously.
(
Tusk knows where you live, Sun 29 Jul 2018, 22:58,
Reply)
tbh, both of your arguments
...are superseded by asking why those images are missing the obligatory b3ta pink colourisation and 3-pubes-per-ball quotient.
(
Prestidigitus will set this 'ere black puddin on you, Sun 29 Jul 2018, 23:08,
Reply)
"That's a false colour image"
Show me a real colour image then.
Any photo, ever, that looks like what we see with our eyes.
(, Mon 30 Jul 2018, 3:44, Reply)
