they can only apply the statutes to your through your person you simply apply the distinction and operate under common law
"Person". 1. a human being. 2. An entity (such as a corporation) that is recognized by law as having the rights and duties of a human being." [Blacks Law Dictionary, 7th Edition]
they are using the second definition when we think there is only one
(, Tue 22 Jan 2008, 15:26, Reply)
Just out of curiousity
(again, devils advocate, I will be watching this with interest as soon as it ramps)
Re the above: So, would he then be accepting under the same loophole that he doesn't have any such human rights, in cases of internment, torture or asylum?
Just that this issue is floating around US courts at the moment, with people who they are trying to register as non-persons in order to get over human rights violations.
(
masakatsu best of all the burger meats, Tue 22 Jan 2008, 18:00,
Reply)