I see it's for real then
Thunberg has the good grace to take direction from reputable sources.
Monkton has his opinion and little more.
on IPCC wrongness... how wrong are we talking here, climate science is a tricky beast.
you ever read this one, clever guy that Asimov is turns out: chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
some degrees of wrongness are acceptable when you are talking in terms of confidence intervals.
on whether the climate has changed rapidly since the industrial revolution (ie. if mankind might have had a hand, or if this is just the tail end of an ice age), have you not seen the uptick?
It's quite clearly very sudden.
this guy has a nice (sourced, also fun?) diagram
xkcd.com/1732/
on CO2, why do you think that's bullshit?
And it's also diverting attention away from cancer, and gun crime. we can think about more than one problem at once.
(, Sat 28 Sep 2019, 18:00, Reply)
^ Oh, absolutely this
This is an unprecedented uptick which is now proven to be linked to the human industrial revolution. Scientists are no longer saying correlation - now it's causation. And we are the cause
(
The_cold_stare Coming here only when very, very bored, Sat 28 Sep 2019, 21:12,
Reply)