
But changing the scale would turn it into a different story. It's a metaphor for the attitude of the British Empire at the time of Wells writing it, there is a lot to be said for not changing it whatsoever.
It's just that crossing the channel to save you from creatures from a different planet doesn't make much sense (in an otherwise excellent book) and puts it firmly in Brian Aldiss's "cosy catastrophe" group of books. So either change it to a different story, or go with illogicality - damned either way really,
( , Sun 29 Sep 2019, 11:37, Reply)

But that would be what you'd do in that situation, wouldn't it? I mean it's not like you'd imagine fleeing to France would be ultimately safe, but it'd undoubtedly be safer than staying in the UK with bloody huge tripods wrecking up the place.
Get somewhere your life isn't in immediate danger. Then plan ahead.
( , Mon 30 Sep 2019, 17:00, Reply)

In terms of conquering the planet, on a practical level, the British Isles really should have been a footnote, looking at land mass etc.
But as I say, it makes it a different book, and muddies the metaphor a bit.
( , Mon 30 Sep 2019, 18:38, Reply)

Ok, but it was written in the late 1800's, when the British Empire was still very much a thing. If you we're slowly but surely drawing your plans against that Earth, an all-out assault on London makes sense. Decapitate the strongest nation, then work on the weaker ones.
( , Mon 30 Sep 2019, 22:54, Reply)

And it would be piss easy for a Planet of Martians to isolate a small island off the coast of Europe, when all you were interested in doing is basically eat everyone.
Don't think that book would have sold much though.
( , Tue 1 Oct 2019, 18:39, Reply)