Prufock's homework for today:
Learn the difference between the words "implied" and "explicit"
( , Fri 24 Apr 2020, 1:28, Share, Reply)
Learn the difference between the words "implied" and "explicit"
( , Fri 24 Apr 2020, 1:28, Share, Reply)
There was no actual physical contact between participants.
They were also very obviously in different places. The violence was therefore only implied. It was not actual, or explicit.
I think I hear a dingo eating your baby.
( , Fri 24 Apr 2020, 10:29, Share, Reply)
They were also very obviously in different places. The violence was therefore only implied. It was not actual, or explicit.
I think I hear a dingo eating your baby.
( , Fri 24 Apr 2020, 10:29, Share, Reply)
no, you still don't understand the terms, sorry
"Robocop didn't have explicit violence because they were only actors and the violence didn't really happen they were just pretending it happened, therefore the violence was only implied. We think it should have a G rating" - have a think about how idioticyou that sounds. Now think of it in the context of a video that's pretty much nothing but people acting out hitting and kicking each other, complete with sound effects.
A little bit of casual racism doesn't compensate for a lack of intellect or wit, I'm afraid.
I think I misjudged you. A few literary references here and there, I assumed you were at least an educated man. pretentious and supercilious, but learned. Now I think you're perhaps a little dim, and your superciliousness is unwarranted. Could you really not understand the application of such simple terms? Or like last time will your fragile ego simply not allow you to concede an obvious error for fear of confronting the reality that you're simply not that smart
( , Fri 24 Apr 2020, 12:00, Share, Reply)
"Robocop didn't have explicit violence because they were only actors and the violence didn't really happen they were just pretending it happened, therefore the violence was only implied. We think it should have a G rating" - have a think about how idiotic
A little bit of casual racism doesn't compensate for a lack of intellect or wit, I'm afraid.
I think I misjudged you. A few literary references here and there, I assumed you were at least an educated man. pretentious and supercilious, but learned. Now I think you're perhaps a little dim, and your superciliousness is unwarranted. Could you really not understand the application of such simple terms? Or like last time will your fragile ego simply not allow you to concede an obvious error for fear of confronting the reality that you're simply not that smart
( , Fri 24 Apr 2020, 12:00, Share, Reply)
I understand the terms perfectly, you struggle with words. You're so stupid you misuse reflexive pronouns.
( , Fri 24 Apr 2020, 12:36, Share, Reply)
( , Fri 24 Apr 2020, 12:36, Share, Reply)
not even creative insults, I think I liked your racism more.
you just keep thinking the video was "implied violence". It was so well done, just that subtle clever suggestion that violence might have happened by actually constantly depicting it on screen with sound effect, punch and kicks and reactions. It was like Fritz Langs M, except instead of the murders happening off screen you saw the knife eviscerating them in a shower of blood splatter. you're obviously too intelligent for me, prufock.
( , Fri 24 Apr 2020, 13:13, Share, Reply)
you just keep thinking the video was "implied violence". It was so well done, just that subtle clever suggestion that violence might have happened by actually constantly depicting it on screen with sound effect, punch and kicks and reactions. It was like Fritz Langs M, except instead of the murders happening off screen you saw the knife eviscerating them in a shower of blood splatter. you're obviously too intelligent for me, prufock.
( , Fri 24 Apr 2020, 13:13, Share, Reply)