no, you still don't understand the terms, sorry
"Robocop didn't have explicit violence because they were only actors and the violence didn't really happen they were just pretending it happened, therefore the violence was only implied. We think it should have a G rating" - have a think about how idiotic
A little bit of casual racism doesn't compensate for a lack of intellect or wit, I'm afraid.
I think I misjudged you. A few literary references here and there, I assumed you were at least an educated man. pretentious and supercilious, but learned. Now I think you're perhaps a little dim, and your superciliousness is unwarranted. Could you really not understand the application of such simple terms? Or like last time will your fragile ego simply not allow you to concede an obvious error for fear of confronting the reality that you're simply not that smart
(
cumquat may will not be commenting further on the allegations, Fri 24 Apr 2020, 12:00,
Share,
Reply)
I understand the terms perfectly, you struggle with words. You're so stupid you misuse reflexive pronouns.
(
Prufrock Lucifer, son of the morning!, Fri 24 Apr 2020, 12:36,
Share,
Reply)
not even creative insults, I think I liked your racism more.
you just keep thinking the video was "implied violence". It was so well done, just that subtle clever suggestion that violence might have happened by actually constantly depicting it on screen with sound effect, punch and kicks and reactions. It was like Fritz Langs M, except instead of the murders happening off screen you saw the knife eviscerating them in a shower of blood splatter. you're obviously too intelligent for me, prufock.
(
cumquat may will not be commenting further on the allegations, Fri 24 Apr 2020, 13:13,
Share,
Reply)