Hi.
She asked for evidence that 7b was not sustainable.
You did not give any evidence for that.
You just went on a rant, like a flat Earther.
(, Fri 5 Jun 2020, 4:43, Share, Reply)
what are you, the fucking comment commentator?
if you want in on this then lay down an opinion, space boy. Tell me how sustainable the planet is, when all you do is watch videos of people trying to leave it.
Besides which, I clearly put a link to Q1 ranked PNAS article, which coincidentally is how people describe your argumentative skills, which I reckon should fall into even your clearly patchy concept of what 'evidence' is
(
cumquat may will not be commenting further on the allegations, Fri 5 Jun 2020, 8:50,
Share,
Reply)
you might disagree with the evidence, but I clearly supplied evidence which is what you were bitching about in your schoolboy meme attempt to whiteknight for brb
I happen to think that 3 billion people having to move in the next 50 years as the conditions become unbearably hot due anthropomorphic global warming is fairly good evidence that we're living unsustainably
(
cumquat may will not be commenting further on the allegations, Sat 6 Jun 2020, 2:29,
Share,
Reply)
The paper is about the climate changing.
That does not mean that 7b is unsustainable.
What you "happen to think" is a different matter entirely.
(, Sat 6 Jun 2020, 17:10, Share, Reply)
yeah, you dont understand how scientific evidence works
When you see all the references in the back of a scientific paper, they're evidence to support the hypothesis. These papers are not saying "this persons main hypothesis is correct". It's how you build a solid conclusion, not by finding papers that agree with your main hypothesis, but those that support it. If you're unable to understand the connection and form a coherent counterargument, that's your failing.
(
cumquat may will not be commenting further on the allegations, Sun 7 Jun 2020, 2:20,
Share,
Reply)