The UK version really did cut all the bits out with nunchucks.
I wonder why. A sword is far more dangerous surely.
(, Mon 13 Jul 2020, 8:37, Share, Reply)
It was to do with 'repeatability' as I recall
The idea was that the BBFC censored anything that kids could easily repeat and cause significant harm.
So swords are ok because kids will just use sticks for swords, and getting clobbered with a stick is pretty minor stuff, unless your mate uses a really, really big stick.
But nunchucks are a different kettle of hyenas. Two short bits of wood and some string and suddenly you can knock some poor sod out without too much trouble.
It was the same deal with punching and headbutting. Punching is ok, people will get bruised, but you're unlikely to knock someone out unless you get lucky. BBFC used to cut headbutts from sub-15 rated stuff because headbutting requires very little skill, and can do serious damage to butt-er and butt-ee alike.
I'm not sure I 100% agreed with it, but it makes a kind of sense.
/relurk
(, Mon 13 Jul 2020, 11:35, Share, Reply)
There are sticks and then there are sticks.
Stick fighting with garden canes can get quite bloody, as I recall. Once they start to split open they pinch your skin and start ripping bits off. And wooden swords are fairly deadly, they can surely break bones. All sticks and whatnot can put someone's eye out.
I think nunchucks were just something new and alien to these censor pricks.
(
brb Learn Ukrainian and prepare for a referendum, Mon 13 Jul 2020, 17:55,
Share,
Reply)