
But am interested in your notion that a person has the right to screw a plaque over the original plaque on someone else’s memorial bench. Can you explain that?
( , Fri 24 Jul 2020, 0:50, Reply)

they just put another small plaque down somewhere else on the bench. it says "close to" not over, and obviously not so close that it's in the same frame
( , Fri 24 Jul 2020, 1:03, Reply)

Kate Hamilton, 40, a groom from Newmarket, was horrified to see the metal plaque, bearing the words ‘Scott, AMJ & Lolly We love this beach’ screwed onto the bench close to the memorial plaque for her grandfather, Ron Hamilton.
( , Fri 24 Jul 2020, 1:04, Reply)

I bet they never even sought or filed the requisite permissions or risk assessments to put the bench there in the first place, and now the council is liable for any damages that arise from its use, the selfish bastards. They confess to placing it there themselves instead of a qualified engineer approved by the council which would have been the safe and appropriate approach. Did they check to see if their ad-hoc installation blocks access routes to fire service? Of course they fucking didn't. And now they have the unmitigated audacity, the brazen effrontery to complain to the papers about somebody else placing a small tasteful plaque when all along they've been littering the landscape with oversize items of unauthorised amenities, it's enough to make you vomit at the blatant hypocrisy and sickening double standards. These people are lower than dogs
( , Fri 24 Jul 2020, 1:47, Reply)

( , Fri 24 Jul 2020, 14:42, Reply)

( , Fri 24 Jul 2020, 18:12, Reply)

( , Fri 24 Jul 2020, 21:14, Reply)

but about whether it should have been screwed there in the first place. So no
( , Fri 24 Jul 2020, 23:43, Reply)

( , Fri 24 Jul 2020, 23:59, Reply)

The rest is semantics
( , Sat 25 Jul 2020, 13:48, Reply)

*the most enjoyable sort.
( , Fri 24 Jul 2020, 3:04, Reply)