You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » links » Link 1564227 | Random (Thread)

This is a normal post “Pretty much everything in your bathroom”
.....and there’s the problem.
(, Sun 11 Apr 2021, 20:55, Reply)
This is a normal post I think the toiletries aisle at Waitrose is ok, but those bastards at Aldi need speaking to.

(, Sun 11 Apr 2021, 21:04, Reply)
This is a normal post Yup and there are ways to muddy the waters so it is difficult to see who is testing.
If all the ingredients have been tested by others in the past they can claim 'product not tested on animals'.
(, Sun 11 Apr 2021, 21:47, Reply)
This is a normal post Well, should stuff tested on animals in the past be now banned?

(, Sun 11 Apr 2021, 22:06, Reply)
This is a normal post It is a rolling system, so eventually everything gets through in time.
Much of the beauty industry is based on marketing anyway, not substantial efficacy. A drug to fight disease would be reasonable testing, new aftershave/eyeshadow/newextrasuperdupernoageingnighttime serum - piss off..
I'm not for banning, just avoiding products that are/might be tested.
Avoiding meat likely prevents more cruelty though.
(, Sun 11 Apr 2021, 22:53, Reply)
This is a normal post I'm down with all of that.
I’d just assumed that was behind us in the UK.
(, Sun 11 Apr 2021, 23:02, Reply)
This is a normal post animal testing for cosmetics or their ingredients was banned in 1998 in the UK
but lots of cosmetics staples like sodium lauryl sulfate were tested on animals and banning them or finding alternatives would be difficult
(, Sun 11 Apr 2021, 23:13, Reply)
This is a normal post I’m not down with wasting time finding alternatives for something that historically was on animals.
They will literally have died in vain if we did that.
(, Sun 11 Apr 2021, 23:35, Reply)