It’s not “I think they couldn’t win”
Recognising the difference between male and female physiology isn’t denigrating them. It’s been demonstrated to you with statistics that female people and male people are not on a level playing field if competing against each other.
The sexist thing is a mindset that implies that women might be faster than Bolt if only they tried a bit harder.
It isn’t sexist to recognise that the fastest female runner should be valued as an exceptional woman, and that that’s equally as meaningful as being the fastest man, even if the fastest man is faster.
Yet again, your problem is your unthinking assumption that “normally” = “competing with men”.
Differing physiology means that if “normal” was “unisex sport”, male people would be the ONLY people in most elite sports.
Your issue is in thinking that the statement “women are not as strong/fast as men” is a value judgement rather than a neutral statement based on observation of peak performances of both sexes plotted on a bell curve.
(, Tue 29 Jun 2021, 23:13, Reply)
A prime example of this is American Football
It is open to both sexes, yet there are no top female players. There is a reason for that.
(, Thu 1 Jul 2021, 16:58, Reply)