not sure about its algorithm
"fish" is 73% different from "therefore", is it?
I'd like to see which categories they're in together. "similar contexts" would suggest a certain amount of subjectivity in the rules.
Got a 92.29 but it doesn't seem to be out of 100 as "conditional" and "stole" are 104 apart on their matrix
And I don't think it's measuring creativity, more one's knowledge of lexicographic categories, making sure you have just one from each with sufficiently different subject areas and tenses
(
cumquat may will not be commenting further on the allegations, Thu 15 Jul 2021, 3:12,
Reply)
never said it was. I expected an even higher rating as they are quite different words
but it seems it's a simple measure of word frequency juxtaposition in sentences rather than any measure of intrinsic difference or creativity, and being lazy academics they probably pointed their compiler and some journal database, hence therefore and fish appearing together more often than you might expect
(
cumquat may will not be commenting further on the allegations, Thu 15 Jul 2021, 15:21,
Reply)
I think it marks you down for getting the instructions wrong
Or maybe it's just a randomly assigned series of numbers, and the real experiment is us.
/twiglet zone
(
Invisible Wizard - 13th Level Scrote, Thu 15 Jul 2021, 15:34,
Reply)
maybe theyre tracking this conversation. MAYBE YOURE ONE OF THEM!
(
cumquat may will not be commenting further on the allegations, Fri 16 Jul 2021, 1:05,
Reply)
Go back to bed citizen, your government is in control!
(
Invisible Wizard - 13th Level Scrote, Fri 16 Jul 2021, 13:39,
Reply)