It was satire. Was it funny? Subjective. Was it defamatory? Was it fuck. He’d have had a very strong defence. But could he afford the lawyers? Everyone’s man of the people social justice martyr Corbyn clearly could.
(, Mon 29 Nov 2021, 15:42, Reply)
- so that his party just threw him under the bus, rather than supporting his defence.
(, Mon 29 Nov 2021, 16:26, Reply)
That selfie on the beach with a can of lager just oozes charm and charisma.
(, Mon 29 Nov 2021, 16:31, Reply)
As my old news editor used to say, if you're going to libel someone, do it properly. say exactly what you're accusing them of. He didn't - he implied to a reasonable person that he sympathises with the hospital bomber - great band name btw.
Corbyn hung out with a great many objectionable people, as I know well. That doesn't stop what this chump said being defamatory and pretty much undefendable. If I were any politician's legal adviser I'd recommend going after anyone with over a few thousand followers if they could be identified.
(, Tue 30 Nov 2021, 19:54, Reply)
You do know, with all your erudition, satire doesn’t have to be literally true, right?
(, Tue 30 Nov 2021, 23:23, Reply)
It's not the point that anyone would believe that he actually laid the wreath it's the clear implication that he sympathises with terrorists.
You need a copy of McNae's.
(, Tue 30 Nov 2021, 18:51, Reply)
www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/aug/13/jeremy-corbyn-not-involved-munich-olympics-massacre-wreath-laying
(, Tue 30 Nov 2021, 19:23, Reply)