Here you go:
youtu.be/xfB_T6QKo8c.
The source isn't really relevant in this case, though, is it? The video itself has been repeatedly verified. The question isn't whether the video is real, but rather the context of the footage. Of course, you're already well aware of this and instead are just clutching at straws trying to divert the conversation to a direction where you can then somehow refute the video itself based on the credibility of the channel I linked it from.
Just be a man and admit that there has been insufficient evidence to conclusively identify the tank as being Russian, and anybody jumping to conclusions about its identity were likely doing so based on nothing but sensationalist media reports. Much like those morons that bought into the 'Ghost of Kyiv' propaganda. There's a good lad.
(, Fri 4 Mar 2022, 21:52, Reply)
I can't see the Agent XIX post. Can you link to it?
The WarLeaks blog seems a bit eager to pass on unconfirmed rumours and innuendo from Russian propaganda sources, and claims itself to be a documentary channel: "WarLeaks - Military Blog is an independent, educational and documentary military channel for military enthusiasts from all around the world!"
Compared to Joe (from, damn where was it, Portsmouth?)'s aircraft blog where he apparently just read from the wikipedia page for the Ghost of Kiev, it does seem rather fake newsy, don't you think?
I'm quite eager to read more of expert youtube comment section military analyst Agent XIX's insights though. Can you link to the comment you screenshot? Cheers.
(
brb man-child cuck corporate supplicant fuck, Sat 5 Mar 2022, 17:46,
Reply)