
You dont say "Putin is right"
Putin makes up the bullshit denazification pretext, as if the fucking russians would give a shit, Putin regular murders critics and jails opposition and acts like a gangster, if hitler walked in the door putin would offer him a job. yet Swaggy just by coincidence think the ukrainians are nazis, and let me quote you about the ukrainians "I use the term 'Nazi' in its most literal sense.". But no, he's not saying he supports Putin. At least not here he's not
Even in this post you're suggesting ukraines integrity is questionable, something that just happens to align with putin's claims. And you pipe up anytime anybody says something positive about the ukraine. If you're not pro-russian you do a convincing impression of someone who is. And now you're saying zelensky is a crook? By what metric? Before the war he already was well on his way to becoming their best president ever, an admittedly low bar on their recent history..But he reformed the constitution for fair referendums, got rid of immunity from prosecutions, and removed a lot of the power of the oligarchs to profit from the privatisation of state assets, not bad for 12 months in power. Now he's fended of an attack by a neighbouring superpower and tireless tried to raise and keep foreign support with 6 million of his citizens homeless, thousands dead and most of the country without power going into winter. So what precisely is it you hate about him, apart from him being jewish?
( , Wed 16 Nov 2022, 13:33, Reply)

www.cato.org/commentary/whitewashing-ukraines-corruption
Hold on, now I don't like Zelensky because he's Jewish? Are you just pulling random statements out of your arse now, cummy?
( , Wed 16 Nov 2022, 13:41, Reply)

it just highlights what poor sources you use to inform yourself, even as you hang shit on the BBC. It's always the way with conspiricy theorists. They bitch abut the lying MSM but when you dig deeper they get their version of reality from much worse places, not better ones.
the article mentions no charge or claims against zelensky, and quotes some index a few years before zelensky came to power, ignoring the fact that zelensky himself was voted in specifically for his promises to deal with corruption of previous governments, that why they went with a comedian with no political experience, and had already made a lot of the reforms he promised. It mentions some scandal in 2014, again, nowt to do with him. And frames his media reforms as repression without ever mentioning that the law itself was one against disinformation, something the UK is in dire need of. the rest is just a lot of sour grapes at his worldwide popularity that you seem to share. Again, you said he was a crook? what precisely to do you mean by that
( , Wed 16 Nov 2022, 14:02, Reply)

Sowwy if I owfended youw poow sensibiwities.
So, tell me. How do you come to the conclusion that I'm anti-semite? I'd love to hear that one. Pretty big accusation to make.
( , Wed 16 Nov 2022, 14:08, Reply)

nobody's whitewashing Ukrainian corruption, least of all zelensky. he came to power specifically by acknowledging it and promising a reform agenda to deal with it, which he followed through with. you seem to hate him and call him a crook without being able to articulate any claim against him other than like the author you resent the global esteem he's held in. your antisemitism is just by process of elimination, though concealing a strong pro-putin stance would be an alternative explanation for your antipathy
( , Wed 16 Nov 2022, 14:49, Reply)