
and considering how launch rates are increasing recently it's hardly the most problematic aspect of this proposal.
I quite like the idea of launching shit-tonnes of ash to L1, seems like a thing we could do rapidly.
( , Mon 24 Jun 2024, 22:43, Reply)

Plenty of ash to reduce solar energy, most wildlife seem to cope with the radiation, population reduction and low cost.
( , Tue 25 Jun 2024, 20:28, Reply)

by releasing ash or some other reflective/sunlight-filtering dust into the upper atmosphere.
I wouldn't rely on North Korean bombs riding Russian rockets to do the job either way. Might as well put your faith in fucking Trident.
( , Wed 26 Jun 2024, 19:16, Reply)

Before they find a way of commercialise/weaponise it.
( , Wed 26 Jun 2024, 22:01, Reply)

These ideas are last-ditch contingency plans *just in case* we don't manage to save the environment through political and economic cooperation (lol). We are already commercially tartaruforming/gehennahforming/hellscaping the planet. These proposals at least offer a kind of terraforming that benefits life on Earth. Surely worth a shot.
( , Fri 28 Jun 2024, 17:54, Reply)

The obscene destruction is one of the reasons I didn't breed. Sometimes it occurs to me that they deserve it.
Then I watch 'Crime pays but botany doesn't' as we are kindred spirits.
Cheer up, 99% of all species have disappeared before and still came back.
( , Fri 28 Jun 2024, 19:47, Reply)