...
they shouldn't be labelled as "green" when they do more harm than good.
Well, for sure. And if you can demonstrate that this is the case in a given situation, then you've identified a problem. It doesn't alter the general picture one jot, though.
Incidentally, I'm not sure that biodegradable is always good. To my uneducated eye, that makes it look as though the carbon'll be released sooner rather than later. Non-degradeable would take it out of circulation in the long term. Course, you'd have a problem with waste, but that's a different matter...
( , Mon 15 Sep 2008, 15:47, Share, Reply)
they shouldn't be labelled as "green" when they do more harm than good.
Well, for sure. And if you can demonstrate that this is the case in a given situation, then you've identified a problem. It doesn't alter the general picture one jot, though.
Incidentally, I'm not sure that biodegradable is always good. To my uneducated eye, that makes it look as though the carbon'll be released sooner rather than later. Non-degradeable would take it out of circulation in the long term. Course, you'd have a problem with waste, but that's a different matter...
( , Mon 15 Sep 2008, 15:47, Share, Reply)