I agree with that too
But why should it be necessary? Just because there's a crackpot theory with no conceivable explanation in science, why is it then given enough credence to warrant further scientific investigation?
My point is simply that the chances of anything being positively proven are close to zero. Doing experiments just to prove that something is wrong when you are already certain of the outcome is a waste of time.
( , Thu 18 Sep 2008, 12:07, Share, Reply)
But why should it be necessary? Just because there's a crackpot theory with no conceivable explanation in science, why is it then given enough credence to warrant further scientific investigation?
My point is simply that the chances of anything being positively proven are close to zero. Doing experiments just to prove that something is wrong when you are already certain of the outcome is a waste of time.
( , Thu 18 Sep 2008, 12:07, Share, Reply)